German media in the war group

The time fights at the forefront

During the not just as a pacifist-known british government in terms of war use in syria, while the german parties in diplomatic peacefulness with reference to the UN dive and even US prasident obama did not want to print the button alone for steering weapons with devastating effect in the capital of a burger war desolate and already strongly destructed country with six million escape strings and previously scattered 73 billion euros of war damage, german media discover the moral imperative of weapons of mass destruction – an example of the curious reasons for a pointless rich frame train.

The liberal action theorists in the time editorial team are safe: "if the west does nothing, assad must understand this as an invitation to continue to use poison gas.", write bernd ulrich on the front page of the time of 5. September 2013. Obviously, the time is more than the british lower house and the german government, namely that the syrian prasident assad uses poison gas cartridges in his own 5 million metropolis to – yes to what? To provoke air raids of the americans because they help him win in the burger war and stay in power? A bizarre calculus. But assad has to, so the hamburg strategists, anyway, cost it what it wanted, because, so the surprising realization: "when he stays, hezbollah governs – and iran."

Quotes from the title page of the time of 5. September 2013:

  • "A military use uses people in syria more than any one."
  • "If the west does nothing, assad must understand this as an invitation to continue to use poison gas."
  • "When he stays, hezbollah governs – and iran."
  • "With us there is no relevant contradiction?. All parties over each other in the argument against a military commitment."
  • "That’s why you have to wish obama a solid majority. And a broad public debate. Because the more the people is involved, the responsible person is it."
  • "A german can only envy the americans."
  • "Let’s say it historically: germany did not liberate germany."
  • "As a highly decorated vietnamveteranes, they are known as the war kepticultural. All the more weight should now have your vote for use."

The fact that the long time moderately active and exposed worldly as well as in religious matter tolerant autocrat and learned ophthalmologist assad would like to share the government with fanatical and work-shaped revolutionary guards, may be considered as a new knowledge of nearby policy research. The burger war would then deliver, so to speak, if assad and the supporting layers of cosmopolitan syrian burgery were most likely to work together with bored koranwachtern.

The time is also a gourmet of democracy. Once, the gerd bucerius received the coveted newspaper license from the british occupation. Well, leitartor ulrich complains: "with us there is no relevant contradiction?. All parties over each other in the argument against a military commitment." – contradiction against the pacifism is well informed.

It is hoped that ulrich is at least with this diagnosis right.

For gluck, so ulrich, hour the motherland of all human rights, the united states of america now ready to jump into the breach: "that’s why you have to wish obama a solid majority. And a broad public debate. Because the more the people is involved, the responsible person is it."

A civil idea: as soon as a parliament, the time exactly as "the people" identified, agrees to a war assignment, this is responsible. A priori. Conclusion of the hanseatic democratic teacher: "A german can only envy the americans."

If his german readers still have not understood why the war in syria is urgently expanded, ulrich has a very special reminder: "let’s say it historically: germany did not liberate germany." with this sentence, this entry ends in the art of political action in world politics. But is the comparison of the 2013 burger war in 2013 with the germany of 1943, which held in a total of europe supported by the whole taxation and poured 6 million jews, really well suited to bring our resistance potentials just against the terrible effects of the pacifism?

On page six, more time experts come to speak. Martin klingst accomodates us with a remark on the role of US militar in the oh so difficult decision-making: "as a highly decorated vietnamveteranes, they are known as the war kepticultural. All the more weight should now have your vote for use."

The fact that highly decorated war veterans are now to be convincing warset after a lost war may also be considered new sociological wisdom. So far, we were obviously completely wronged that professional warriors are only in office, because they should further expand this trade with the necessary expertise. The fact that their advice is particularly valuable to war because they were highly decorated war losers in senseless massacres, their qualifications are seriously questioned for further use – even for the retired study rate, which read the time?